How to Submit and Present an MTT Paper |
|
![]() |
|
| If
you've
never done this before, it can be an intimidating prospect. Just think:
you're going to give a presentation to about 600 experts in your field,
all of whom are skeptical as hell and will do whatever they can to show
the world you're an idiot. It's enough to turn your shoes brown.
Actually, it's really not so bad. After all, you can always sell insurance to make a living. Or, you can prepare well and feel confident that you've got it all together. Here's how the system works and what you should know about paper submission and presentation. |
|
| Sub-
mission |
The MTT symposium is a research symposium. This means that a paper must present, well, research. The term research can be broadly defined to include a variety of things, but the essential component is novelty. An MTT paper must present something that can be considered new information. It can be sophisticated, theoretical academic research, or an ingenious practical application or design method, but must not be obvious or trivial. The rule is quite broad; however, the element of novelty is essential. If it's been done before, or it's obvious that it can be done, don't bother submitting it. Having heard all that, you will be pleased to know that MTT papers tend to be more practical than most archival publications. Most of the papers in the MTT Transactions are designed less to inform than to make some particular academic's reputation. Such papers do show up at the MTT Symposium, but they don't do well: after all, who can understand pages of industrial-strength mathematics at a glance? The gutsy, practical stuff is more interesting and useful in the kind of environment we have at the MTT. And, that's what the attendees come for.
|
Click here for a copy of a paper on the subject that appeared in the MTT Newsletter a few years ago. (Sorry, some parts are getting a little dated; see below.) For a less reverent treatment of the subject, click here.
|
|
| The
Mechanics |
It's really not so bad. The thing to remember is that acceptance is based on a summary of the paper, not the paper itself. The summary must not be too brief; it must show what was done, what was special about it, and what the results were. It must be clear that the results are significant, novel, and worthy of publication. Conversely, however, including lots of math and nonessential details wastes the reviewers' time, when they are reviewing several dozen papers. Excess detail will not endear you to them. The most common reason for rejection of papers is lack of clear information about what was done and what new results were obtained. Make these things clear, and you're already way ahead of the pack. The second most common reason, of course, is that the paper is simply crap. In the last few years, the MTT has moved from paper to electronic submission. (Can we still call them papers? Maybe we'll have to call them silicons!) Only a few years ago, the Instructions for Authors form still began with "Put a new ribbon in your typewriter." Egad! In the last few years, the new practice of electronic submission was being fine tuned, so the process for submitting papers changed at least a little every year. Now it's pretty stable. Still, check the web site for submission information and download everything you need. It's not a bad idea to get a template for the paper and to use it. The IEEE publication organization seems to be infatuated with third-rate word processors like MS Word and Tex. They have never recognized FrameMaker, even though it is the primary product used by corporate publication departments worldwide. For a template in FrameMaker format, according to the 2004 standards, click here. In general, however, you must create a PDF of your paper and upload it to the IMS website. In this process, fonts are a perennial problem. You should be aware that fonts are part of your computer's operating system, not part of your document; the next guy's computer may not have the same fonts as yours. So, to be safe, make sure your fonts are embedded in the PDF document. Also, you can use color in your paper, but it's a good idea not to depend on it too much; many reviewers don't like to deal with PDFs on-screen, so they print out the papers on monochrome printers. The IMS no longer publishes paper digests, only PDFs on CD, so color can be used freely in the final version of the paper. Incidentally, the MTT Symposium's acceptance rate runs around 45% - 50%.
|
Be sure to sign and submit the copyright form. This is the most frequently forgotten part of the package; it is absolutely essential. Your paper won't be published without it. Your second paper is the slides for the symposium presentation or, if your paper was accepted for it, the posters for the Interactive Forum. Now, before you create these, think a little! What will be most useful to people in the audience? What do they want to hear about your work? Do they want to see a lot of highfalutin' mathematics? Do they want to see a lot of slick Powerpoint viewgraphs with really cool color schemes and animation? Or, do they want to know what you did and what the results were, and how to use them in their own work? Design the presentation accordingly. Presentations are all electronic. Do not plan on using your own laptop; this is no longer practical. These days, presentation materials are usually submitted before the symposium date and preloaded onto the computers. If the papers have not been preloaded, bring your presentation on a CD or, best, a USB memory stick. Either way, bring a backup. If the paper has not been preloaded, load it before the session begins. If it has been preloaded, check it. Papers usually are in Powerpoint form. I find Powerpoint inadequate for technical presentations, because of its clumsy graphics and difficulty dealing with equations, Greek letters, and mathematical symbols. (Remember, fonts are in the computer, not your document! Your presentation may look great on your computer, then, in your presentation, have question marks where the Greek letters should have been.) I always use PDFs of viewgraphs, with fonts embedded. Works a lot better.
|
|
| The Big Day |
Stand up straight and look at the audience. It's amazing how many people turn their backs to the audience, stare at the projection screen, and mumble. It is best to bring your presentation to the session on a CD ROM or USB memory stick. Bring a back-up. Don't use floppies or other media that are unreliable or might not be supported. Load it on the computer before the session begins. The MTT Symposium has a speaker's preparation room where you can load your presentation into a computer and check it. You must also come to the session early so your presentation can be loaded before the session starts. On the day of the presentation, go to the speaker's breakfast and meet the session chairman. You need to know who he is, and he needs to be reassured that you are there. Come to the session well in advance, identify yourself to the chairman, and sit in the front row. Check out the audio-visual equipment so you know how it all works. Get a glass of water if you might need it. When it's time to give your talk, try not to throw up on the lectern. After the talk, there may be a few questions. Many speakers are petrified of this part of the talk, but they shouldn't be. Really hostile questions are rare at the MTT; MTT people are just too polite. (Well, OK, a lot are complete jerks, but, in any case, they're not very aggressive.) Finally, stay for the whole session and stay afterward to answer questions by people who didn't have a chance to ask them after the presentation. This is a traditional courtesy.
|
| Rules |
|